<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tweet to Comment ratio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/</link>
	<description>blog designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik Biswas</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik Biswas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t find Digg/Twitter/Facebook useful at all, regarding spreading the actual content. Digg appears to be a content directory where people are voting their choices, in Twitter it&#039;s just the 140 chars, and Facebook is a mixup of so many activities. It&#039;s hard to keep track with updates from contacts. If I login to FB after 3 or 5 hours, I find over 200/250 updates from contacts, I have lesser than 100 friends. So I have to scroll down and down to get all those 250 updates. Similar with Twitter as well. As of Digg, articles having less than 20 votes never catch our attention if we don&#039;t really dig up the site well. Only very popular websites&#039; articles get enough votes to appear up the list and catch our attention. What&#039;s the use really? Already popular websites don&#039;t need Twitter or Digg to get more popular.

If I like an article in your site, I&#039;ll be glad to write something meaningful in comments rather than to pass it onto Digg/Twitter/Facebook and make them more popular instead. I feel that is letting down the article writer badly. If the writer finds more comments than tweets/retweets and diggs he/she&#039;ll be more happy and will find more inspiration to write more in the future. Interaction of writer and reader is so important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find Digg/Twitter/Facebook useful at all, regarding spreading the actual content. Digg appears to be a content directory where people are voting their choices, in Twitter it&#8217;s just the 140 chars, and Facebook is a mixup of so many activities. It&#8217;s hard to keep track with updates from contacts. If I login to FB after 3 or 5 hours, I find over 200/250 updates from contacts, I have lesser than 100 friends. So I have to scroll down and down to get all those 250 updates. Similar with Twitter as well. As of Digg, articles having less than 20 votes never catch our attention if we don&#8217;t really dig up the site well. Only very popular websites&#8217; articles get enough votes to appear up the list and catch our attention. What&#8217;s the use really? Already popular websites don&#8217;t need Twitter or Digg to get more popular.</p>
<p>If I like an article in your site, I&#8217;ll be glad to write something meaningful in comments rather than to pass it onto Digg/Twitter/Facebook and make them more popular instead. I feel that is letting down the article writer badly. If the writer finds more comments than tweets/retweets and diggs he/she&#8217;ll be more happy and will find more inspiration to write more in the future. Interaction of writer and reader is so important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6512</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your fantastic comments - which I&#039;m still digesting and mulling over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your fantastic comments &#8211; which I&#8217;m still digesting and mulling over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#8220;new&#8221; design for blog comment buttons? &#124; cre8d design: blog designer</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8220;new&#8221; design for blog comment buttons? &#124; cre8d design: blog designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6504</guid>
		<description>[...] my last post I wondered about the tweet-to-comment ratio (I&#8217;m still digesting your fantastic comments &#8211; thank you!) and I&#8217;m still wondering if the viral-focus has meant more traffic but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post I wondered about the tweet-to-comment ratio (I&#8217;m still digesting your fantastic comments &#8211; thank you!) and I&#8217;m still wondering if the viral-focus has meant more traffic but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OGenius</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6501</link>
		<dc:creator>OGenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6501</guid>
		<description>I you really want to discover the reasons of those changes, a friend of mine, @Deherve (twitter.com/deherve) was asking the same question on his blog. Maybe you should read the few elements of answers I wrote about it.
More than answering to this question, I try to bring new elements of analyze.
http://tinyurl.com/yha7hpd
Goole translator is needed for those who don&#039;t hunderstand french!

OGenius
Mac Aficionados</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I you really want to discover the reasons of those changes, a friend of mine, @Deherve (twitter.com/deherve) was asking the same question on his blog. Maybe you should read the few elements of answers I wrote about it.<br />
More than answering to this question, I try to bring new elements of analyze.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/yha7hpd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yha7hpd</a><br />
Goole translator is needed for those who don&#8217;t hunderstand french!</p>
<p>OGenius<br />
Mac Aficionados</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damond Nollan</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6500</link>
		<dc:creator>Damond Nollan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6500</guid>
		<description>Like a few before me, Twitter RT&#039;s help me spread the word about my blog. There are times that I find folks RT&#039;ing without ever really reading. This may happen because the person likes me, trusts me, and supports everything I do. In another situation, I find that people who have not read the blog RT because of blog title.

Of course, the obvious reason for RT&#039;ing is to share this information with followers. 

Do I think RT&#039;ing takes away from commenting? No, because the typical RT barely adds additional thought. Although, Chris Brogan often creates his own message when sharing RT&#039;d information. 

In the end, people who want to comment, will. Just assume that many of your readers just do not have much to say OR they are not bloggers themselves.

I find that bloggers learn to comment on other people&#039;s blogs because they too want others to comment on their stuff. With A-Listers, they have tons of bloggers following them and all vying for attention. For many of us less known authors, our work falls on family and friends who probably don&#039;t blog at all.  Let alone, RT.

Keep doing what you&#039;re doing. Write, comment on other people&#039;s blog, and engage with your own readers where ever they may be, and the number of comments will increase. It may never match the number of RT&#039;s but it will increase.

P.S. To find out where your stuff is being read and commented on, check out http://analytics.postrank.com and use referral code: &quot;grooved-gull&quot; 

I find this service has helped me realize the power of engagement and to go where people are talking about my comments.

Thanks for writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a few before me, Twitter RT&#8217;s help me spread the word about my blog. There are times that I find folks RT&#8217;ing without ever really reading. This may happen because the person likes me, trusts me, and supports everything I do. In another situation, I find that people who have not read the blog RT because of blog title.</p>
<p>Of course, the obvious reason for RT&#8217;ing is to share this information with followers. </p>
<p>Do I think RT&#8217;ing takes away from commenting? No, because the typical RT barely adds additional thought. Although, Chris Brogan often creates his own message when sharing RT&#8217;d information. </p>
<p>In the end, people who want to comment, will. Just assume that many of your readers just do not have much to say OR they are not bloggers themselves.</p>
<p>I find that bloggers learn to comment on other people&#8217;s blogs because they too want others to comment on their stuff. With A-Listers, they have tons of bloggers following them and all vying for attention. For many of us less known authors, our work falls on family and friends who probably don&#8217;t blog at all.  Let alone, RT.</p>
<p>Keep doing what you&#8217;re doing. Write, comment on other people&#8217;s blog, and engage with your own readers where ever they may be, and the number of comments will increase. It may never match the number of RT&#8217;s but it will increase.</p>
<p>P.S. To find out where your stuff is being read and commented on, check out <a href="http://analytics.postrank.com" rel="nofollow">http://analytics.postrank.com</a> and use referral code: &#8220;grooved-gull&#8221; </p>
<p>I find this service has helped me realize the power of engagement and to go where people are talking about my comments.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pip</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6499</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6499</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree with JaBig - on time short working days when you skim content, know it&#039;s valuable but, in my case, sometimes don&#039;t have the time to comment, the RT is the perfect (and dare I say lazy) option. It shows that
a) you&#039;ve acknowledged the value
b) you care enough to spread the word
c) allows a little private trail to go back and read later - which is what I do - I skim through all my RT&#039;s and read at my leisure - then I know I haven&#039;t missed anything.
I have to say I don&#039;t comment too often - unless I feel strongly about something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with JaBig &#8211; on time short working days when you skim content, know it&#8217;s valuable but, in my case, sometimes don&#8217;t have the time to comment, the RT is the perfect (and dare I say lazy) option. It shows that<br />
a) you&#8217;ve acknowledged the value<br />
b) you care enough to spread the word<br />
c) allows a little private trail to go back and read later &#8211; which is what I do &#8211; I skim through all my RT&#8217;s and read at my leisure &#8211; then I know I haven&#8217;t missed anything.<br />
I have to say I don&#8217;t comment too often &#8211; unless I feel strongly about something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Saric</title>
		<link>http://www.cre8d-design.com/2010/01/the-tweet-to-comment-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-6498</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Saric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cre8d-design.com/?p=517#comment-6498</guid>
		<description>We all know that a percentage of visitors to a blog that actively comment on the blog post, is very very low. Somewhere in low single digits. Twitter seems to &quot;wake up&quot; some of them, so they at least actively share the content that they read so I don&#039;t think there is anything wrong with that. I invite all comments but also all the retweets. After all they will spread my message to a larger audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that a percentage of visitors to a blog that actively comment on the blog post, is very very low. Somewhere in low single digits. Twitter seems to &#8220;wake up&#8221; some of them, so they at least actively share the content that they read so I don&#8217;t think there is anything wrong with that. I invite all comments but also all the retweets. After all they will spread my message to a larger audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
