I just visited a new Web 2.0 photo sharing site and saw a front page list of things you can do such with high up on the list: “Tag your photos!” Gee, is tagging that high up on people’s wish lists? I just spent some time organising the 750 or so (physical) photos we took while in South America (digital versions on Flickr) – it was a fun job and brought back recent memories as I sat cross-legged on our lounge floor.
Organising them on Flickr was as simple as putting them into albums (“sets”) for different parts of our trip. I started by bulk tagging photos (“South America”, “Peru”, …) but gave up quickly. I realised I wasn’t going to need those tags – I was just going to jump to an album and look through the set of photos until I found the one I wanted. Besides, I took about 80 photos of Machu Picchu (oops!) and they’d all be tagged the same. I’d need to look at them to figure out the exact one I wanted. In a sense, the albums were acting as my tags, I didn’t need anything further.
Tagging can be incredibly useful (e.g. for delicious) but often the tags slow me down from what I’m wanting to be doing – like one of those sign-up forms where I have to enter in lots of information before joining. If there’s no future value in the tags – or I can’t imagine one, I’m not interested in tagging them. Ok, so maybe I won’t have many people discovering my photos by accident on Flickr, but that’s not what they’re there for.
I just hope Web 2.0 applications don’t get caught up in tagging (because someone said it’s cool) and focus on features people need, problems which need solutions.
Get actionable tips to grow your website
Thoughtful weekly insights (no hype!) on improving your website